Subject	Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo?
Posted by	-Grimm- on September 26, 2013 at 5:33 PM
	This message has been viewed 266 times.
Message	Anyone ever tried this on their Z? Just out of curiosity. Although it is possible that oil contamination may wreck the MAF, or that the pressure in the charge pipe may cause it to read incorrectly, I am wondering just how much different the reading would be (assuming the oil issue is prevented). I understand both aspects of the idea, and I already forgot why I wanted to ask, but hey... why not.
Follow Ups	Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? - -Grimm- 17:33:04 09/26/13 One thought - part would probably require more - jzack 18:24:55 09/26/13 Re: Theoretical: Why not put MAF after the turbo? - 300ZMang 18:36:17 09/26/13 Most cars are designed with them at atmospheric pressure - -Grimm- 09:32:00 09/27/13 Go figure - -Grimm- 10:58:06 09/27/13 if you consider that the MAF measures mass flow - aliaZ 18:33:36 09/27/13 The method the MAF uses to monitor air flow - -Grimm- 19:16:23 09/28/13 hmm...after the intercooler would be best in my opinion - inf 23:32:50 09/26/13 That's what I would think - -Grimm- 13:01:34 09/27/13 The purpose of the MAF is not to measure air intake temp. - Dark Diver 06:49:44 09/28/13 Because after the turbo air is hotter and so has greater - Dark Diver 06:54:22 09/28/13 air after the turbo is actually much slower - aliaZ 16:16:58 09/28/13
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.